Design Crux

Information, Captology, Desirability in Design

Designing Culture

STAHL: You are at a college of education. What—what is taught, when teachers go to school, about parents?
Ms. SMREKAR: That they are scary, that they are threats, that they are to be avoided. Colleges of education do not teach teachers to develop productive relationships with parents. It’s not done.
STAHL: That’s a pretty remarkable admission, that teachers are trained to push parents away.
—60 Minutes, Segment: Pentagon Schools (airdate: CBS, Sunday April 21, 2002, 7:00 PM E.S.T.)

Evaluate the following statement: Parents need to be more involved in the schooling of their children.

It sounds just about right, I found myself thinking recently as I watched a television show about American schools. This particular program went into detail about the problem no one talks about. Needless to say it was parental involvement. Quite the opposite of my experience, I can’t recall a discussion about education where the role of parents in the system’s problems went unmentioned.

Nevertheless, parents are the hidden problem within the system. The facts are impressive, with all sorts of data to back up the position children of highly–involved parents do better in school. More important even than more money or a host of other commonly called for advantages. Which is so obviously true, you can almost skip over the small quibble that the description far outweighs the prescription.

Eating Change For Breakfast,
Then Getting Back To The 9 to 5 Business Of Maintaining Status Quo

…the 800–pound gorilla that impaired performance and stifled change was culture.

—Changing the Way We Change

Within the flood of data about how nice increasing parental involvement might be, a small point of information is missing. How do we change the current situation? As well understood as the situation is, and for all the description of the outcome sought, the real hidden problem is the lack of a plan to get from one system state to another. Mistaking data about the problem for information about the solution is, as always, part of what’s wrong. The paralysis by analysis endemic to the information age is not an information age problem, but one of data processing as sole corrective step. In processing data about the system, you find yourself an expert in the assumptions which make the problems seem unchanging and unchangeable.

Change in an ecology is systemic. When one element is changed, effects can be felt throughout the whole system. Local changes can disappear without a trace if they are incompatible with the rest of the system. For example, when schools set new goals for what students must learn in math, they also have to develop new ways of evaluating what the students have learned. Otherwise, teachers will find themselves under pressure to teach the material that was covered on the old tests, and the innovation will fail.
—Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart by Boni A. Nardi and Vicki L. O’Day

Systems work in certain ways. First systems maintain status quo. Second in priority is system growth. And only in efficient systems does the reason for the system ever reach third place. Corporate cultures, teams, work processes, and any system you care to imagine all seek these primary objectives. A Harvard Business Review article, Changing the Way We Change, was not talking about schooling when writing “…the 800–pound gorilla that impaired performance and stifled change was culture.”

Moreover, while styling was what kept buyers coming back year after year for the latest edition of their favorite car, Donner could not stand the prima donnas in charge of automotive styling. So, out of touch with where the public wanted the car companies to go in the future and completely dismissive of those inside of GM who did understand the proper evolution of the automobile, Donner slowly but surely led GM off the path to success. And Donner and his protégés in the accounting towers controlled GM’s fate for the next 35 years.
GM: Cool But Misguided?

Nobody was thinking the same thing at GM and Ford. Both companies consciously declined to trade certain short-term costs, like redesigning and retooling, for possible long-term gains. Not unusual for large, risk-averse corporations. They’d rather be safe than sorry. Let tomorrow take care of itself, is their mindset. You won’t hear them talk that way in public. But despite what American automakers’ TV commercials would have you believe, they got left in the dust, buried in confusion over what the public is clamoring for today.
Corporate short–termism nets less than the long view

Adam Bosworth extends system thinking to software design “That software which is flexible, simple, sloppy, tolerant, and altogether forgiving of human foibles and weaknesses turns out to be actually the most steel cored, able to survive and grow while that software which is demanding, abstract, rich but systematized, turns out to collapse in on itself in a slow and grim implosion.”

You Get What The System Is Designed To Produce

We are building complex multimedia smart classrooms without training teachers to teach, learners to learn, and without building the tools and infrastructure necessary for effective learning in the broad learning space. Like a 747 without trained pilots, reservations systems, airports, or an air traffic control system we cannot expect to get off the ground, much less soar.
New Learning Spaces: Smart Learners, Not Smart Classrooms by Howard Strauss; Campus Technology Magazine

There is an old saying a technology is anything which was developed after you were born. Classrooms, school systems, and even chairs are tools, or technologies so ingrained in a culture their use becomes reflexive, subconscious. When you turn your attention from parents to parental interaction, you find…

  • Forbidding architectural style
  • Check–in procedures
  • A perspective which equates parent involvement with loss of control
  • Homework not designed for increasing levels of parent involvement
  • Incomprehensible jargon
  • The perceptual barrier of intruding on a expert performing their profession
  • Internal policies which may not anticipate parents need to know how and how much more they could be interacting with the school

When interviewed by members of a parent involvement project called Red Chair, the most frequent response from parents was they were never invited to participate more. Data about the status quo is processed and logged and analyzed and accumulated. Yet where on the school web site is there a section which is accessible, visible, and labeled Parent Involvement? Rethinking the underlying assumption of a tool can turn it back into a technology. A chair can act like a red carpet — an open invitation for parental involvement.

Donella H. Meadows recognized leverage points like rules, rewards and information flows influence the natural self–organizing behaviors of human systems. People waste effort, time and money treating visible symptoms rather than hidden structural leverage points. System thinkers understand something. If you get certain results over and over with minor variation, you’re getting what the system was designed to produce.

If you want a different outcome, design a different culture.

Related Articles:

Creating The Captology Information System

Getting Mission Statements and About Us Pages Off The Information Blacklist

Information Work: What Is Context Worth?

Resources

Copyright ©2002–2008 John Soellner. All Rights Reserved.